Groups Appeal: Davao City Should Junk Waste Incineration, Take On the Zero Waste Solution
Technologies that
burn discards, destroy resources, weaken recycling and create extremely toxic
emissions should not be employed if Davao City wants a greener
and sustainable future for all.
This is the message that a citizens’ forum co-organized by the Sustainable
Davao Movement (SDM) and the EcoWaste Coalition would like to resonate among
the city’s policy makers and planners. The former is a network of civil
organizations in Davao City advocating for a greener and
sustainable home for all Dabawenyos, while the latter is an environmental
health coalition based in Quezon City. The forum was held at the
Ateneo de Davao University.
Instead of
incinerating its waste, estimated at 570-600 metric tons
daily, Davao City will be better off if proven approaches in
preventing and reducing trash are put in force, the groups said.
“The 600-ton waste-to-energy incineration plant being mulled by the city
government has to be carefully assessed against the hierarchy of waste management
options that puts reduction of waste at source as the top choice,”
said Mylai Santos, Director, Ecoteneo, a member of the SDM’s waste
management cluster.
“The city’s landfill has overloaded its capacity because we have failed to
ensure that the generation of waste is minimized through mandatory segregation
at source and other Zero Waste solutions stipulated in national and local
laws,” Santos said.
Both the Republic Act 9003, or the Ecological Solid Waste Management Act of
2000, and Ordinance 0361-10, or the Davao City Ecological Solid Waste
Management Ordinance of 2009, provide for the compulsory sorting of discards at
source by all waste generators, as well as the establishment of barangay-based
materials recovery facilities (MRFs).
According to the City Environment and Natural Resources Office, only 17 of Davao City’s 112 barangays have MRFs such as those in Barangay Cabantian, Catalunan Grande, Hizon, Mahayag and Mintal.
According to the City Environment and Natural Resources Office, only 17 of Davao City’s 112 barangays have MRFs such as those in Barangay Cabantian, Catalunan Grande, Hizon, Mahayag and Mintal.
Speaking at the forum, Dr. Jorge Emmanuel, a DOST Balik Scientist and adjunct
Professor at Silliman University, said: “Gasification, plasma arc and
pyrolysis waste-to-energy technologies that require waste as input to operate
and make a profit will encourage more consumption of materials, more use of
energy, and the generation of more waste.”
Emmanuel is especially concerned that incinerators will not meet increasing
stringent dioxin standards due to cost, lack of enforcement mechanisms, and the
inability to effectively monitor and test emissions, adding there is no such thing
as “clean incineration.”
“Even with pollution control devices,
the toxic pollutants will not disappear; they are concentrated into other media
that have to be treated as hazardous waste. Importantly, ash from incinerators
is toxic, heavily contaminated with dioxins and leachable metals, and under the
Stockholm Convention Best Available Techniques/Best Environmental Practices
(BAT/BEP) guidelines, ash requires special land disposal as hazardous waste,”
he explained.
Lora Mc-ren Abengoza, Campaigner, EcoWaste Coalition, warned “waste incineration will burn precious recyclable and compostable resources, hurt recycling enterprises and take jobs away from the informal waste sector (IWS), depriving poor households and communities of employment and livelihood opportunities.”
At last Saturday’s workshop organized by the EcoWaste Coalition in San Pedro College, participants, including 99 informal recyclers from Davao City, affirmed the need to integrate the IWS in formal waste management toward clean, safe, decent and secure jobs and livelihoods.
For her part, Anne Larracas, Managing Director, Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives – Asia Pacific said: “Waste-to-energy incineration will be a burden, not a boon, to Filipinos. It is the most harmful, most expensive, most polluting, most energy intensive and most inefficient way to generate electricity. Countries in the developed world are already shifting away from incineration and are now pursuing Zero Waste approaches. The Philippines must leapfrog to Zero Waste and leave incineration behind.”
Lora Mc-ren Abengoza, Campaigner, EcoWaste Coalition, warned “waste incineration will burn precious recyclable and compostable resources, hurt recycling enterprises and take jobs away from the informal waste sector (IWS), depriving poor households and communities of employment and livelihood opportunities.”
At last Saturday’s workshop organized by the EcoWaste Coalition in San Pedro College, participants, including 99 informal recyclers from Davao City, affirmed the need to integrate the IWS in formal waste management toward clean, safe, decent and secure jobs and livelihoods.
For her part, Anne Larracas, Managing Director, Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives – Asia Pacific said: “Waste-to-energy incineration will be a burden, not a boon, to Filipinos. It is the most harmful, most expensive, most polluting, most energy intensive and most inefficient way to generate electricity. Countries in the developed world are already shifting away from incineration and are now pursuing Zero Waste approaches. The Philippines must leapfrog to Zero Waste and leave incineration behind.”
-end-
Comments